Other Anomalous Pictures
The Strangest Picture of all was taken by the Hubble. Shortly after it's release in October of 1995, there was suddenly a lack of good recent Hubble pictures!
After the release
of this picture, JPL explained the two bright spots by saying one of them
was a "chunk" ejected from the comet. Yet the comet was far too
far from the sun for thermal or gravitational tides to account for this
kind of action. More than any other picture, this picture clearly shows
a comet like object in orbit around another body. It's a beautiful picture
of a comet in orbit with it's tail maintaining a near perfect circle as
it orbits. This view is nearly head on to the comet. NASA also tried to
explain the "pinwheel" appearance of this picture by saying the
comet was spinning - like a lawn sprinkler and causing it's tail and the
mystery "chunk" to spiral off. Yet, all recent observations of
the comet show it is not spinning. What made it stop spinning? This too
is a major question.
This
is a strange picture indeed. I don't think they meant for this one to get
out. It was taken July 16, 1996 by the Tiede Observatory in the Canary
Islands. The dark object at the center of the comet is an optical device
to prevent the bright nucleus from over exposing the comet and losing details
of the "jets." The diagonal orange and dark lines are the result
of the telescope following the comet against a background of stars (in
highly enhanced and processed color.) But what the hell is that dark
circle in the 10 o'clock position from the comet that is not streaked like
the stars and apparently moving with the comet? Notice also that the "jet"
from the comet heading toward that thing appears to be influenced by the
shape of the "thing." It looks as if the "jet" expanded
there to get around the "thing."
The Comet's Mysterious Eyes
Just days after the above picture was released, three amateur astronomers in New Mexico took this amazing picture. They used a 16 inch telescope with a CCD imager to reveal something very strange appeared "near" the comet nucleus for 10 to 20 minutes and then disappeared. I put the word near in quotes because the actual distance if the object were near the comet would be on the order of hundreds of thousands of kilometers. This anomaly has not been explained. It is not a background star as photos taken at nearly the same time reveal no star there. It is also not a CCD hot spot as those are most often just one single pixel that is bad. This anomaly spans a number of pixels and its brightness diminishes as the distance from the hottest pixel increases. Ironicly, this picture was displayed by a group of astronomers who had nothing but ridicule for my picture.
And this is really
interesting. It's a picture taken by a half meter telescope in Japan (about
20 inches.) The picture was taken in April of 1996. The bright spot in
the two o'clock position from the comet was first described as an anomaly.
The picture was displayed that way for 6 months. Later, when the comet
and the "companion" started getting some attention thanks to
Art Bell and the internet, the Japanese did some backtracking. They called
the vertical rod emanating from the "object" a flaw in the CCD
imager and said the "companion" was really a star. If the vertical
dark spire is really a CCD flaw, then why does it have edges that appear
brighter then the nearby comet coma? A flaw would simply produce a dark
line - not "outlined" in a lighter color. Also, the "object"
appears to have two faint comet like jets in the 8 and 4 o'clock positions.
This picture has since completely disappeared from the Japanese web site
it was displayed on for many months.
And Check This Report From Some Skywatchers in Arizona
On Saturday night, Dec. 7th, a small group of us from MUFON AZ went out to our desert skywatch location to look for comet HB. We spotted first with binoculars a little after sunset. We had to wait for the sky to darken in the west. It was low in the west, maybe 15 deg. above the horizon and just a little north of the Milky Way. We had three telesopes. Our best telescope was the Celestron C-8. The consensus of opinion is that HB has a companion. Now Alan Hale said to go out and look for ourselves. We did, but it still looks like there is a second bright object near HB! We switched to a 187X power eyepiece to look at it one last time before it descended into western haze.
AS a footnote, we also enjoyed looking at the rings of Saturn, the ring nebula in Lyra - this is just south of the bright star Vega, and the galaxy in Andromeda.
Sincerely,
Bill Hamilton